For this project, I chose to watch and reflect on the documentary, "Cartel Land". This highly interesting film shows the different sides of the conflicts on both sides of the Mexico-U.S. border. On the U.S. side, film crews follow Tim "Nailer" Foley and his partners who formed a group to patrol the border to keep watch for immigrants illegally crossing into the United States. Foley makes it clear that he is against the term "vigilante" because it usually brings a bad name. He states that his partners and he are simply doing what the United States government failed to do which is successfully protect the border.
On the Mexico side of the border, film crews follow Dr. Jose Manuel Mireles. Mireles tells of how he started the group known as the "Autodefensas". The men in this group have all joined together to stand up against the cartel who terrorize their towns. Mireles also tells of how his men and he had to arm themselves in order to protect themselves from the cartel because local police and military were unable to protect the people of the city. This is where viewers can sense a type of similarity between the two sides. Both men have decided to stand up and take action in order to do what a failing government could not do.
While watching this documentary, I felt as if I were watching an action movie of some sort. Dr. Mireles is portrayed as a hero of the city who united many towns under a common cause. The people of these towns all love Mireles and his men and are consumed with joy whenever they come into town. In one scene, the Autodefensas raided a building in which they found cartel members inside. After a few hours of gunfire, the military showed up and shut things down. They harassed the Autodefensas and took their weapons. The military also stated that the townspeople were scared of the Autodefensas and their weapons and demanded they leave. In a shocking turn of events, the townspeople gathered with the Autodefensas and protested the military until they gave them back their weapons. It was unreal to me that things like such are actually taking place in our neighboring country. If I did not know that I was watching a documentary and was only showed this one scene, I would think that I was watching an action/thriller movie. One scene that also got to me, and that also showed some negative emotions towards the Autodefensas, was when some leadership changes were forced to be made. In an unfortunate accident, which completely took me by surprise, Dr. Mireles was hospitalized after surviving a plane crash. While he was in the hospital in Mexico City, Mireles appointed his right-hand man known as "Papa Smurf" as the temporary leader of the Autodefensas. When Papa Smurf and his men roll into a new town, they are confronted by the townspeople. Although it is unclear whether or not the entire town feels this way, some men speak out against the Autodefensas. They say that they do not like the guns and how the men have been treating some of the women of the town. This scene is shocking because it shows that not all people agree with how the group goes about their business.
Overall, this documentary is one that I would recommend to anyone and everyone. It shows two different yet similar sides and how each stand up for what they believe in. This documentary will change your perspective on the drug wars going on currently in Mexico and also how the United States plays a role in it. I would very much like to see a follow up of the two groups in a few years.
I definitely agree how this documentary felt like an action/thriller movie of some sorts. One thing I noticed is how the vigilantes united to try to protect their people. The Autodefensas in Mexico and the Arizona Border Recon were both working outside the government to ensure safety that the government was not providing. Although, I wish the film talked a little more about the Arizona Border Recon and their role.
ReplyDeleteI definitely agree how this documentary felt like an action/thriller movie of some sorts. One thing I noticed is how the vigilantes united to try to protect their people. The Autodefensas in Mexico and the Arizona Border Recon were both working outside the government to ensure safety that the government was not providing. Although, I wish the film talked a little more about the Arizona Border Recon and their role.
ReplyDeleteBLAKE!!! WOW....JUST WOW!!! Your depiction of this documentary grabbed me and didn't let me go until the end. The journey that you take the reader on is full of passion and vivid colors!! I truly felt your emotions just jumping off of the page, truly the personality of a great writer!!
ReplyDeleteKeep up the great work and have a great weekend!!
I agree with Blake and Mary that this documentary based on what I read here will be something out of a action movie. It is surprising how some people agree with the Autodefensas and others are completely against them. This shows that people who are struggling the same way have different perspectives about what is right or wrong. I feel that those who were against the Autodefensas were scared of what the government would do if they allowed the Autodefensas protect them. It is one thing to follow the law, and it's another thing to go against the law to do the right thing.
ReplyDelete"It is one thing to follow the law, and it's another thing to go against the law to do the right thing." .... yes. on repeat. ad infinitum.
DeleteInteresting. You say, "Foley makes it clear that he is against the term "vigilante" because it usually brings a bad name. He states that his partners and he are simply doing what the United States government failed to do which is successfully protect the border." What's kind of funny, here, is that Foley essentially DEFINES "vigilante." He may want to distance himself from the connotations of the term, but he's a vigilante, all right. Now, that we get to try to understand him is what the film provides, which is laudable. That the law is corrupt, seeming to call for vigilantes, this too creates some of the film's central tensions.
ReplyDeleteYou do a good job of helping others to see the value of the film -- I see we have some future viewers!! Good post!